Contrast agents for cardiac catheterization: Conceptions and misconceptions
- 31 October 1991
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 122 (4) , 1129-1135
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(91)90481-v
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 76 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of meglumine sodium diatrizoate, lopamidol, and lohexol for coronary angiography and ventriculographyCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1990
- A multicenter randomized trial of ionic (ioxaglate) and nonionic (iopamidol) low‐osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiographyClinical Cardiology, 1989
- Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985
- Comparative trial of iohexol 350, a non-ionic contrast medium, with diatrizoate (Urografin 370) in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography.Heart, 1984
- Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): Advantages over standard ionic agentsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Cardiac Function During Left Coronary Arteriography in Canines with Ioxaglate, Nonionic Compounds, and DiatrizoateInvestigative Radiology, 1980
- Contrast Media in Coronary Arteriography: A ReviewInvestigative Radiology, 1978
- Electrocardiographic Changes During Selective Coronary CineangiographyCirculation, 1966
- Hemodynamic and Electrocardiographic Effects of Selective Coronary Angiography in ManNew England Journal of Medicine, 1966