Evaluation of a New Combined Antigen and Antibody Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening Assay, VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra
Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 40 (4) , 1420-1426
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.40.4.1420-1426.2002
Abstract
Combined antigen and antibody screening (fourth-generation) assays reduce the diagnostic window period between the time of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and laboratory diagnosis by 4 days, on average, in comparison to antibody-only (third generation) enzyme immunoassays (EIAs). The aim of the present study was to assess whether the new VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra (Biomérieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France) showed an improved sensitivity and specificity in comparison to licensed fourth-generation assays. A total of 16 seroconversion panels, 15 cell culture supernatants infected with different HIV type 1 (HIV-1) subtypes, and 257 potentially cross-reactive serum samples were tested with VIDAS DUO HIV Ultra, Genscreen Plus HIV Ag-Ab, Enzygnost HIV Integral, Enzymun-Test HIV Combi, Genscreen HIV 1/2, version 2 (third-generation EIA), and Genetic Systems HIV-1 Ag EIA (p24 antigen assay). VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra showed a comparable sensitivity to the single p24 antigen assay in seroconversion panels and a dilution series of virus lysates. The diagnostic window was reduced with VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra by 3.82 days, on average, in comparison with the fourth-generation assay with the lowest sensitivity of the antigen detection module. HIV-1 infection was detected 5.88 days earlier than with third-generation EIA. The mean time delay between reverse transcription-PCR and VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra was only 2.31 days. The specificity of fourth-generation assays after retesting ranged between 98.1 and 100%. In conclusion, VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra can replace single-antigen screening for laboratory diagnosis and screening of HIV infection in blood donors. There was no evidence for a second diagnostic window due to impaired sensitivity of the antibody detection module of all the fourth-generation EIAs evaluated in the present study. The specificity after initial and/or repeated testing of VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra was equivalent to that of a third-generation assay.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Seven Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Antigen-Antibody Combination Assays: Evaluation of HIV Seroconversion Sensitivity and Subtype DetectionJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- Fourth-Generation Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Simultaneous Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antigen and AntibodyJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- Nucleic acid amplification testing of blood donors fortransfusion‐transmitted infectious diseasesTransfusion, 2000
- Multicenter evaluation of a new rapid automated human immunodeficiency virus antigen detection assayJournal of Virological Methods, 1999
- Feasibility and efficacy of routine PCR screening of blood donations for hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, and HIV-1 in a blood-bank settingThe Lancet, 1999
- Cost‐effectiveness of expanded human immunodeficiency virus‐testing protocols for donated bloodTransfusion, 1997
- Diversity of V3 Region Sequences of Human Immunodeficiency Viruses Type 1 from the Central African RepublicAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 1993
- Effectiveness of assays for antibodies to HIV and p24 antigen to detect very recent HIV infections in blood donorsAIDS, 1992
- Prevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 p24 Antigen in U.S. Blood Donors — An Assessment of the Efficacy of Testing in Donor ScreeningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Exposure of Patients to Human Immunodeficiency Virus through the Transfusion of Blood Components That Test Antibody-NegativeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989