Activation of command fibres to the stomatogastric ganglion by input from a gastric mill proprioceptor in the crab,Cancer pagurus†

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
In semi‐intact preparations of the crab Cancer pagurus the normal output from the stomatogastric ganglion (StG) was a regular pyloric cycle (Figure 4). Repeated stimulation of the posterior stomach nerve (psn) of the posterior gastric mill proprioceptor (PSR) often induced series of spontaneous gastric cycles. We were therefore able to describe the normal gastric cycle as recorded in the output nerves from StG and to identify most of the relevant motor neurones by reference to the muscles that they innervate (Figure 10). The gastric cycle output was variable (Figures 5, 6), although in many preparations one complex type of output predominated (Figure 7). The basic feature of the gastric cycle was an alternation of activity between the single cardio‐pyloric neurone (CP) and a complex variable burst in the lateral cardiac (LC), the gastro‐pyloric (GP), the gastric (GM), and other associated neurones. During this normally occurring complex gastric burst significant changes occurred in the pyloric cycle, notably an increase in activity of the pacemaker pyloric dilator (PD) group and an inhibition of the lateral pyloric (LP), inferior cardiac (IC) and ventricular dilator (VD) neurones (Figures 6, 7, 8, 9). These changes are probably associated with an opening of the cardio‐pyloric valve and food passage into the pyloric filter. The gastric output was related to the normally observed movements of the dorsal ossicles of the gastric mill and thus to the operation of the teeth of the mill (Figure 11). Increased input from the PSR is associated with the grinding action of the teeth which is caused by the complex gastric burst (Figure 12). Stimulation of the psn during an ongoing regular pyloric output caused changes in the cycle which mimicked those occurring during the spontaneous gastric cycle (Figure 13; Table 1). Stimulation of the psn during ongoing gastric activity also affected the gastric units (Figure 14). The input pathway from the PSR is shown to be through the stomatogastric nerve (sgn), the connection between the commissural ganglia and the stomatogastric ganglion (Figure 15). The commissural ganglia are known to receive most of the sensory input from the foregut and PSR input is probably processed there. Recordings from the sgn show that psn stimulation activates a small number of centrally originating units, and that the activity of these units coincides with the pyloric output changes (Figures 15, 16). We therefore label the units command interneurones. Their effects could be mediated by direct connections to only the PD pacemaker neurones of the pyloric cycle. Control experiments showed that PSR input is not necessary for the pyloric output changes to occur during gastric output but that similar output changes can be evoked by input resulting from induced gastric movements (Figure 15(E)). We think that the pyloric cycle output changes are normally controlled by a number of mechanisms at different levels (Figure 17). We cannot easily explain the effects of PSR input on the gastric cycle neurones. These findings are important because they allow us to study a specific input to the StG without disrupting its normal input‐output pathways to the central nervous system. Further experiments on the system designed to test the assumption that the sgn units are in fact responsible for the pyloric output changes, and to investigate the processing of the PSR input are outlined.