A Comparison of Dermatologists' and Primary Care Physicians' Accuracy in Diagnosing Melanoma
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Dermatology
- Vol. 137 (12) , 1627-1634
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.137.12.1627
Abstract
Objective To compare the accuracy of dermatologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) in identifying pigmented lesions suggestive of melanoma and making the appropriate management decision to perform a biopsy or to refer the patient to a specialist. Data Sources Studies published between January 1966 and October 1999 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CancerLit databases; reference lists of identified studies; abstracts from recent conference proceedings; and direct contact with investigators. Medical subject headings included melanoma, diagnosis, screening, primary care, family practitioner, general practitioner, internal medicine, dermatologist, and skin specialist. Articles were restricted to those involving human subjects. Study Selection Studies that presented sufficient data to determine the sensitivity and specificity of dermatologists' or PCPs' ability to correctly diagnose lesions suggestive of melanoma and to perform biopsies on or refer patients with such lesions. Data Extraction Two reviewers independently abstracted data regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the dermatologists and PCPs for diagnostic and biopsy or referral accuracy. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. The quality of the studies was also evaluated. Data Synthesis Thirty-two studies met inclusion criteria; 10 were prospective studies. For diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity was 0.81 to 1.00 for dermatologists and 0.42 to 1.00 for PCPs. None of the studies reported specificity for dermatologists; one reported specificity for PCPs (0.98). For biopsy or referral accuracy, sensitivity ranged from 0.82 to 1.00 for dermatologists and 0.70 to 0.88 for PCPs; specificity, 0.70 to 0.89 for dermatologists and 0.70 to 0.87 for PCPs. Receiver operating characteristic curves for biopsy or referral ability were inconclusive. Conclusions The published data are inadequate to demonstrate differences in dermatologists' and PCPs' diagnostic and biopsy or referral accuracy of lesions suggestive of melanoma. We offer study design suggestions for future studies.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- General practitioner screening for melanoma: sensitivity, specificity, and effect of trainingJournal of Medical Screening, 1998
- Melanocytic Naevus or Malignant Melanoma? A Large-scale Epidemiological Study of Diagnostic Accuracy: Clinical ReportsActa Dermato-Venereologica, 1998
- The effect of the introduction of a pigmented lesion clinic on the interval between referral by family practitioner and attendance at hospitalBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1998
- Improving primary care residents’ proficiency in the diagnosis of skin cancerJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1998
- Family physicians' knowledge of malignant melanomaJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1997
- Primary care physicians as gatekeepers in managed care. Primary care physicians' and dermatologists' skills at secondary prevention of skin cancerArchives of Dermatology, 1996
- Skin cancer detection in a clinical practice examination with standardized patientsJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1996
- Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerationsStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Accuracy in clinically evaluating pigmented lesions.BMJ, 1989
- The Use of an ROC Curve to Express Quality of Care ResultsMedical Decision Making, 1982