Morphological Productivity and Phonological Transparency
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique
- Vol. 26 (1) , 63-72
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008413100023525
Abstract
With a few important exceptions, such as Berko (1958) and Derwing and Baker (1977), linguistic morphology has always been a descriptive science, content with investigating actually occurring words and extracting patterns from these. Consequently, it has suffered from a difficulty common to all descriptive endeavours, the fear of obscuring individual cases in abstracting to general principles. In turn, as a result of this deficiency, morphological theory has tended to expend its energy not on general patterns, but rather on single words: more thought has been devoted to the one English word sang than to most other topics. In an earlier paper, Aronoff and Schvaneveldt (1978) showed how an experimental technique borrowed from cognitive psychology, the Lexical Decision Task, could be used to investigate morphological patterns without focusing primary attention on single actually occurring words. The essence of the technique is to ask native speakers of a language (English in this case) whether certain stimuli are words of their language or not.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Word Formation in Generative GrammarLanguage, 1979
- TESTING MORPHOLOGICAL PRODUCTIVITYAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1978
- Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed wordsJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975
- Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognitionJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971
- The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-FormationLanguage, 1971
- The Child's Learning of English MorphologyWORD, 1958