Statistical methods can be improved within Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews
- 1 June 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 64 (6) , 608-618
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may misleadBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-AnalysisJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2008
- Simpson's paradox visualized: The example of the Rosiglitazone meta-analysisBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Recent developments in meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysisJAMA, 2006
- A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpointsStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of ResearchEducational Researcher, 1976