Reconstructive Legitimacy in Final Reports of Contract Research
- 1 August 1986
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Review
- Vol. 34 (3) , 573-589
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1986.tb00689.x
Abstract
It is argued that final reports of contract research firms are best understood as documents embedded in a political economy rather than as objective depictions of reality. That political economy gives rise to distortions of the research process in such reports we conceptualize as ‘reconstructive legitimacy’. That concept points to a set of structural conditions which induce contractors to gloss over problems and misrepresent research events. Reconstructive legitimacy functions to convey the image of these for-profit organizations as capable of delivering a viable and useful product to their sponsors. Implications of this manifestly political and economic process for policy research and formulation are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Sociological Import of G. H. Mead's Theory of the PastAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- In Search of MesostructureUrban Life, 1982
- George Herbert Mead and Karl Marx: Exploring Consciousness and Community*Symbolic Interaction, 1981
- Social Scientists' Ethical Responsibilities to Superordinates: Looking Upward MeeklySocial Problems, 1980
- Our New Research Society: Some Warnings for Social ScientistsSocial Problems, 1980
- A Social Organizational Approach to Problems of Ethics in Clinical ResearchPerspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1978
- The Social Context of Evaluative ResearchEvaluation Quarterly, 1977
- Comment on Conflict Methodology: a Protagonist PositionThe Sociological Quarterly, 1976
- Conflict Methodology: an Introduction and Preliminary AssessmentThe Sociological Quarterly, 1976
- Reforms as experiments.American Psychologist, 1969