Accuracy and Reproducibility of Estimating the Adequacy of the Squamous Component of Cervicovaginal Smears

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
In the Bethesda System for reporting cervicovaginal cytology results, 1 criterion for smear adequacy is an adequate squamous component. The accuracy of a cytologist’s estimate that 10% of the slide is covered by squamous cells, the adequacy threshold, has not been determined. The percentage of the surface of a glass slide covered by squamous cells was independently estimated by 4 cytologists on 2 occasions by microscopic examination of 83 buccal smears prepared to display estimated coverage of 1% to 20% of the slide surface. The accuracy of visual estimates was compared with measurements by the TracCell System. Each observer made a third set of estimates after receiving 5 slides with known coverage. Median coverage by visual estimation ranged from 4% to 25%, but as measured by the TracCell system was 2%. Median estimated coverage was significantly different for 2 of 4 observers between first and second viewings and between all but 1 pair of observers. For all observers, it was significantly higher than the true coverage. A visual estimate of 10% coverage corresponded to a true median coverage of 3%. When provided with a physical standard, the median estimated coverage by 3 of 4 observers was not statistically different from the true coverage, and interobserver κ values improved. Unaided visual estimation of the adequacy of squamous cell coverage is neither reproducible nor accurate. What most cytologists consider “adequate” coverage represents only 3% coverage. The availability of a physical standard dramatically increases reproducibility and accuracy.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: