Evaluation of Interlaboratory Geochemical Data: Some Considerations on the Abbey‐Rousseau Debate, the Meaningfulness of the Median and Other Topics
- 1 October 1986
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Geostandards Newsletter
- Vol. 10 (2) , 183-189
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908x.1986.tb00826.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confidence Intervals for the Median of Data Sets Containing up to 300 ObservationsGeostandards Newsletter, 1986
- PRAGMATISM vs RIGOUR: A Debate on the Resolution Of Disparate Analytical Data on Four Canadian Iron ‐ Formation Reference SamplesGeostandards Newsletter, 1985
- Evaluation of Analytical Data: A Practical Guide for GeoanalystsGeostandards Newsletter, 1982
- Another Approach to the Mode of a Skewed Set of Data: the Plot Method*Geostandards Newsletter, 1980
- The Gamma Transformation Mode: A Mode or a Median ?*Geostandards Newsletter, 1980
- Comparison of the effectiveness of various procedures for the rejection of outlying results and assigning consensus values in interlaboratory programs involving determination of trace elements or radionuclidesAnalytica Chimica Acta, 1980
- Reference Samples of Rocks ‐ The Search for “Best Values”Geostandards Newsletter, 1979
- A critical examination of analytical errorTalanta, 1978
- Estimation of the Mode by the Dominant Cluster MethodGeostandards Newsletter, 1977
- Data Transformation as a Means to obtain Reliable Consensus Values for Reference MaterialsGeostandards Newsletter, 1977