Using Routine Data to Evaluate Quality of Care in British Hospitals
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 35 (10) , OS102-OS111
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199710001-00013
Abstract
As part of the process of developing an international comparative study of the outcome of hospital care it has been necessary to understand what data on hospital activity are available and how they compare with those in other countries. The authors describe the administrative data collected in British National Health Service Hospitals, with emphasis on how they differ from that available in the United States. A description of the content of administrative data and a selective review of published literature related to their uses. Administrative data in the United Kingdom resembles that available in the United States, but it also has some important differences. These include a different system of procedure classification, the use of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (rather than International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification), and the use of a different denominator ("finished consultant episodes," rather than admission spells). There also are important differences in the completeness and precision of the data that are collected. British administrative data can be used to describe patterns of care and have the potential to identify possible differences in outcome that can then be subjected to more detailed scrutiny. They are substantially less detailed than US data but are also somewhat less costly to collect.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Report Cards on Cardiac Surgeons — Assessing New York State's ApproachNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Routine data: a resource for clinical audit?Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1993
- Meeting local needs.BMJ, 1993
- The language of health.BMJ, 1993
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- Caseload or workload? Scoring complexity of operative procedures as a means of analysing workload.BMJ, 1990
- Risk adjustment in claims-based research: The search for efficient approachesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989
- Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data. The role of length of stay and comorbiditiesJAMA, 1988
- Hospital Inpatient MortalityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987