Reproducibility and accuracy of airway area by acoustic reflection

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
To determine the accuracy and reproducibility of measurements of airway area by acoustic reflection (AAAR) we made repeated measurements of tracheal areas in human volunteers, glass airway models, and excised canine tracheae. In 10 adult males, the mean ratio of tracheal AAAR to tracheal areas determined roentgenographically was not significantly different from one (1.06 +/- 0.13 SD). Within-run variability was 10 +/- 4% (CV), mean intrasubject day-to-day variability was 9 +/- 4% (CV). A custom-made mouthpiece is necessary for accurate measurements of AAAR. Mean variability related to differences in mouthpiece construction was 7 +/- 6% (CV). The effect of variations in upper airway and glottic sizes on tracheal AAAR measurements was investigated using glass airway models. In model studies, tracheal AAAR measurements were found to be independent of changes in proximal airway size for glottic apertures greater than or equal to 1 cm2 and upper airway areas less than or equal to 8 cm2. Tracheal area was, however, overestimated by 20% in the rigid-walled glass models. The effects of airway wall rigidity were qualitatively investigated by comparing acoustic and roentgenographic measurements of excised canine tracheae surrounded by either air or petroleum jelly. Differences in the accuracy of measurements of AAAR in vitro and in vivo are probably due to differences in airway wall inertance. These studies suggest that the measurement of AAAR yields an accurate and reproducible result that may be clinically useful for the noninvasive detection of changes in central airway geometry.