Excess Funds and Agency Problems: An Empirical Study of Incremental Cash Disbursements
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 13 (1) , 219-248
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/13.1.219
Abstract
This study investigates the excess funds hypothesis using samples of special dividends, regular dividend increases, and self-tender offers. All three types of firms tend to have funds in excess of industry norms before the events. The excess funds are largely nonrecurring for special dividend and self-tender offer firms and recurring for regular dividend increase firms. The analysis of the stock price reaction suggests that large incremental disbursements mitigate the agency problem associated with excess funds. In particular, the stock price reaction is positively related to excess funds for self-tender offers and large special dividends, but not for regular dividend increases (which tend to be smaller) or small special dividends.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Changes in Dividends Signal the Future or the Past?The Journal of Finance, 1997
- Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statisticsJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statisticsJournal of Financial Economics, 1996
- Share Repurchase and Takeover DeterrenceThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1991
- Dividend clienteles and the information content of dividend changesJournal of Financial Economics, 1990
- Stock Repurchase as a Takeover DefenseThe Review of Financial Studies, 1989
- Asset pricing and the bid-ask spreadJournal of Financial Economics, 1986
- The Impact of Initiating Dividend Payments on Shareholders' WealthThe Journal of Business, 1983
- Quarterly Dividend and Earnings Announcements and Stockholders' Returns: An Empirical AnalysisThe Journal of Finance, 1980
- Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and "The Bird in the Hand" FallacyThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1979