The Kinematic Rotating Hinge Prosthesis for Complex Knee Arthroplasty
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health
- Vol. 392 (392) , 283-291
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200111000-00037
Abstract
Fifty-eight patients (69 knees) treated with the Kinematic Rotating Hinged knee prosthesis for complex primary and salvage revision total knee arthroplasty were followed up for an average of 75.2 months (range, 24–199 months). The indications for use of the Kinematic Rotating Hinged knee prosthesis included severe bone loss combined with ligamentous instability (30 knees), nonunion of a periprosthetic fracture (10 knees), an acute periprosthetic fracture (nine knees), severe collateral ligamentous instability (five knees), reimplantation for infection (six knees), nonunion of a supracondylar femoral fracture (four knees), congenital dislocation of the knee (three knees), and treatment of a severely comminuted distal femur (two knees). At the time of surgery, the average patient age was 72 years (range, 46–92 years). Preoperatively, knee extension averaged 4.94° (range, 0°–40°) and flexion averaged 81° (range, 15°–125°). At final followup, knee extension averaged 1.25° (range, −5°–25°) and flexion averaged 94.2° (range, 5°–125°). The preoperative Knee Society Knee score averaged 40.3 points (range, 2–93 points) and improved to 77 points (range, 33–99 points) at final followup. Complications were numerous: 23 (32%) patients experienced at least one complication and 12 (17%) patients had two or more complications. Deep periprosthetic infection was the most common complication (14.5%), followed by patellar complications (13%), and prosthetic component breakage (10%). During the period of this study, there were 15,798 primary and 2673 revision total knee arthroplasties done at the authors’ institution. The patients receiving a Kinematic Rotating Hinged knee prosthesis represent a highly complex and small subset (0.37%) of the overall population having knee arthroplasty. Although the use of the Kinematic Rotating Hinged knee prosthesis for these limited indications has been useful for the authors, the incidence of complications and the poor outcome of these complications is disconcerting. Hinged total knee arthroplasty should be reserved for the final salvage option of the treatment options available when doing complex primary and salvage revision knee arthroplasties.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of Periprosthetic Tibial FracturesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2000
- The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2000
- Total knee arthroplasty in femorotibial instabilityDer Orthopäde, 2000
- Rotating knee prosthesisDer Orthopäde, 2000
- The effects of the rotating-hinge total knee replacement on gait and stair steppingThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1999
- Problems with the rotaflex: A 10-year review of a rotating hinge prosthesisThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1998
- Complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the condylar constrained prosthesis: An average 5-year follow-upThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1998
- Is there a future for hinged prostheses in primary total knee arthroplasty?The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1998
- Megaprostheses after resection of distal femoral tumors: A rotating hinge design in 30 patients followed for 2-7 yearsActa Orthopaedica, 1996
- Arthroplasty with a composite of an allograft and a prosthesis for knees with severe deficiency of bone.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1995