The Status of Circumcision of Newborns
- 3 May 1990
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 322 (18) , 1308-1312
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199005033221810
Abstract
From the early 1940s until the mid-1970s, circumcision of newborn boys was accepted in the United States as a simple procedure that promoted hygiene and prevented genital disease. Educated middle-class parents almost always had their newborn sons circumcised. The opinion that circumcision prevented cancer of the penis and was associated with a lower incidence of cervical cancer in sexual partners was generally accepted. It helped prevent phimosis and associated local infection and resulted in genital cleanliness. These middle-class parents were willing to pay for the procedure (there were few insurance programs in the 1940s and 1950s). The infant sons of . . .Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- The foreskin and urinary tract infectionsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1989
- Effect of circumcision status on periurethral bacterial flora during the first year of lifeThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1988
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection among Men with Sexually Transmitted DiseasesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection among Patients Attending Clinics for Sexually Transmitted DiseasesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Pain and Its Effects in the Human Neonate and FetusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Circumcision I: Effects upon newborn behaviorInfant Behavior and Development, 1980
- Adhesion to normal human uroepithelial cells of Escherichia coli from children with various forms of urinary tract infectionThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1978
- Neonatal circumcision and penile dorsal nerve block—a painless procedureThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1978
- Failure of Sodium Salicylate to Inhibit Hyaluronidase in VitroScience, 1947
- CIRCUMCISION AND PENILE CANCER.Published by Elsevier ,1932