On the Statistical Measure of Infectiousness
- 1 July 1931
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Epidemiology and Infection
- Vol. 31 (3) , 336-351
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s002217240001086x
Abstract
We all recognise that some diseases are more “catching” than others. Every mother knows that measles is very catching and most people set aside a group of common complaints, measles, mumps, whooping-cough, scarlet fever, diphtheria—perhaps roughly in that order—as catching complaints. Then again, still keeping ourselves within the circle of ideas of educated non-medical people, one has such complaints as common colds or influenza which one thinks of as running through a house indeed but does not put quite into the measles category, as one feels that factors determine the spread other than mere proximity to a sick person. Lastly, one has some illnesses, gonorrhoea would be a fair example, which everybody recognises to be spread wholly by contagion, almost always by a particular method of contagion, but does not regard as catching at all in the sense that measles and whooping-cough are catching. When we enquire into the reasons of these opinions they will be found, I think, to be these.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practical Applications of the Statistics of Repeated Events' Particularly to Industrial AccidentsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1927
- An Inquiry into the Nature of Frequency Distributions Representative of Multiple Happenings with Particular Reference to the Occurrence of Multiple Attacks of Disease or of Repeated AccidentsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1920
- Multiple Cases of Disease in the same House: Appendix to Papers in Biometrika, VOL. VIII. p. 404 AND p. 430Biometrika, 1913
- A Note on the Age Distribution of Deaths from Diabetes MellitusBiometrika, 1911