Prospective Study on the Augmentation of the Maxillary Sinus With Calcium Sulfate: Histological Results
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Periodontology
- Vol. 71 (6) , 940-947
- https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.6.940
Abstract
The main goal of the sinus elevation procedure is the formation of vital bone to allow the tissue integration of endosseous implants to support prosthetic restorations in the edentulous posterior maxilla. The ideal graft material is yet to be found. The present study investigated the histologic results of a sinus augmentation procedure performed with calcium sulfate as the grafting material. The clinical trial consisted of 2 groups: a first (control) group of 12 patients (15 sinuses) in which the material was carefully placed but not stratified. In the second (test) group, 45 patients (50 sinuses) were treated by modifying the application. The calcium sulfate was putty-like in consistency and placed as it hardened in layers, avoiding fluid contamination. The histologic samples were collected, either at 9 months, at the uncovering procedure (for implants placed simultaneously with grafting material), or at 6 months at the time of implant insertion (for implants placed at a later stage). The augmentation procedure resulted in good, new tissue formation within the sinuses when clinically and radiographically evaluated. The technique used in the test group produced a reduction in the graft shrinkage during healing, therefore slowing down the material resorption rate. Histologically, new bone formation with progressive lamellar maturation was found in both groups. Some particles produced by calcium sulfate resorption were still present after 6 months in the test group specimens, but no longer detectable after 9 months. Samples from the control group showed a mean histomorphometric bone density of 34.25% +/- 10.02, while samples from the test group showed a mean value of 55.54% +/- 19.82. The results of this study indicate that calcium sulfate appears to be an effective material for sinus augmentation, yielding vital bone suitable for implant integration. In addition, the technique used in the test group seemed to improve the quality and quantity of bone formation.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bone classification: clinical‐histomorphometric comparisonClinical Oral Implants Research, 1999
- REMODELING DYNAMICS OF BONE SUPPORTING RIGIDLY FIXED TITANIUM IMPLANTS: A HISTOMORPHOMETRIC COMPARISON IN FOUR SPECIES INCLUDING HUMANSImplant Dentistry, 1995
- Short‐Term Healing of Autogenous and Allogeneic Bone Grafts After Sinus Augmentation: A Report of 2 CasesThe Journal of Periodontology, 1994
- Maxillary sinus augmentation: Histomorphometric analysis of graft materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentationJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1993
- BONE-GRAFTING MATERIALS IN IMPLANT DENTISTRYImplant Dentistry, 1993
- Sinus Lift Grafts And Endosseous ImplantsDental Clinics of North America, 1992
- Simultaneous maxillary sinus floor bone grafting and placement of hydroxylapatite-coated implantsJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1989
- Morbidity from bone harvest in major jaw reconstruction: A randomized trial comparing the lateral anterior and posterior approaches to the lliumJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1988
- Regeneration of Bone in the Presence of Calcium SulfateJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1980