Rethinking the Merger of the Clinical Nurse Specialist and the Nurse Practitioner Roles
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Vol. 26 (4) , 315-318
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00341.x
Abstract
The clinical nurse specialist (CNS) and nurse practitioner (NP) have been distinct and separate advanced nursing practice roles since the 1960s. The forces of economics and health care reform have fostered an interest in merging these two advanced practice roles. Economic and regulatory advantages have been noted in the literature for both roles. What is not so evident are the possible disadvantages. Several aspects of the merger issue are explored as is the recent background of the creation of the CNS and NP roles. Problems and questions are asked to stimulate future discussions in nursing's professional associations and in education and service settings.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tertiary Nurse PractitionersImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1993
- Editorial: Nurses as House StaffThe American Journal of Nursing, 1993
- The Role of the Female Doctorally Prepared Nurse in Caring for Infertile WomenClinical Nurse Specialist, 1993
- The Imposter Phenomenon in the Clinical Nurse Specialist RoleImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1992
- Clinical Nurse Specialist Curriculum PlanningClinical Nurse Specialist, 1990
- Advanced Practice NursingMCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 1990
- Opposition to Title Change Overwhelming : The Nurse PractitionerThe Nurse Practitioner, 1987
- Clinical Nurse Specialists in Collaborative PracticeClinical Nurse Specialist, 1987