Nicardipine for stable angina pectoris.
- 1 February 1985
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 20 (S1) , 178S-186S
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1985.tb05162.x
Abstract
Nicardipine, 30 and 40 mg thrice daily, was administered to 66 patients with stable angina pectoris in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial. With nicardipine therapy, duration of exercise and cumulative oxygen consumption increased, while times to onset of angina and 1 mm ST segment depression were prolonged. Anginal frequency and nitroglycerin consumption declined with use of nicardipine, but this did not reach statistical significance. Resting heart rate increased slightly and resting blood pressure decreased. Two patients on nicardipine and one on placebo sustained acute infarction. Otherwise, side effects were generally mild and transient.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The dependence of the cardiac effects of nifedipine on the responses of the peripheral vascular system.Circulation, 1984
- Efficacy of diltiazem in angina on effort: A multicenter trialThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- The effects of calcium channel blocking agents on cardiovascular functionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- Mechanism of Action of Calcium-Channel-Blocking AgentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Treatment of stable angina of effort with verapamil: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized crossover study.Circulation, 1982
- Comparative pharmacology of calcium antagonists: Nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazemThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Therapeutic implications of slow-channel blockade in cardiocirculatory disorders.Circulation, 1980
- Coronary steal-induced increase in myocardial infarct size after pharmacologic coronary vasodilationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Nifedipine therapy for stable angina pectoris: Preliminary results of effects on angina frequency and treadmill exercise responseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1979