Albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of postoperative bleeding
- 1 August 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 72 (2) , 527-533
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02745-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of three plasma expanders used as priming fluids in cardiopulmonary bypass patientsPerfusion, 1998
- Hemostatic effects of three colloid plasma substitutes for priming solution in cardiopulmonary bypassEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- A Comparison of 10% Pentastarch and 5% Albumin in Patients Undergoing Open‐Heart SurgeryThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1994
- Influence of Different Intravascular Volume Therapies on Platelet Function in Patients Undergoing Cardiopulmonary BypassAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1993
- Influence of Five Different Priming Solutions on Platelet Function in Patients Undergoing Cardiac SurgeryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1992
- Hydroxyethyl starch: an alternative to plasma for postoperative volume expansion after cardiac surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- A Comparison Between 25% Albumin and 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch Solutions on Lung Water Accumulation During and Immediately After Cardiopulmonary BypassAnnals of Surgery, 1987
- Hydroxyethyl Starch versus Albumin for Colloid Infusion Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients Undergoing Myocardial RevascularizationThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1984
- Clinical Comparison of Hetastarch and Albumin in Postoperative Cardiac PatientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1982
- Hetastarch as a Prime for Cardiopulmonary BypassThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1982