Citation analysis as an unobtrusive method for journal collection evaluation using psychology student research bibliographies
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Collection Building
- Vol. 17 (1) , 20-28
- https://doi.org/10.1108/01604959810368965
Abstract
Bibliographic citation analysis of student research papers is one method of evaluating the use of a journal collection. Journal selection and cancellation may be done on the basis of use and cost‐effectiveness to maximize the usefulness of materials purchased with the library budget. An analysis of the bibliographic citations of research papers by undergraduate and graduate students in the psychology department of St Mary’s University was used as one basis for psychology journal selection and deselection in the academic library. Findings confirmed that the most cost‐effective and the most used materials were usually held by the library. Titles that met these criteria and were not held are good candidates for new subscriptions. Likewise, the least cost‐effective and least‐used titles are candidates for cancellation. Convergence of data from other sources should be used to confirm citation analysis findings due to the inherent limitations of the method.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Local Citation Studies-A Shortcut to Local KnowledgeScience & Technology Libraries, 1994
- Library Materials Use by College Freshmen:College & Undergraduate Libraries, 1994
- Graduate Student Use of Journals:Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 1993
- Journal citations.American Psychologist, 1984
- Journal quality: The issue of diversity.American Psychologist, 1983
- The citation impact factor: Another dubious index of journal quality.American Psychologist, 1982
- Impact on science?American Psychologist, 1979
- An evaluation of 80 psychology journals based on the Science Citation Index..American Psychologist, 1978
- On the citation analysis of psychology journals.American Psychologist, 1978
- Ratings of psychology journals compared to objective measures of journal impact.American Psychologist, 1976