A prospective, randomized trial comparing mechanical methods of hemostasis plus epinephrine injection to epinephrine injection alone for bleeding peptic ulcer
- 31 August 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 60 (2) , 173-179
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01570-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consensus Recommendations for Managing Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal BleedingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Ulcers and Nonvariceal BleedingEndoscopy, 2003
- A prospective, randomized trial of large- versus small-volume endoscopic injection of epinephrine for peptic ulcer bleedingGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2002
- Prediction of therapeutic failure after adrenaline injection plus heater probe treatment in patients with bleeding peptic ulcerGut, 2002
- Endoscopic Factors Predisposing to Rebleeding Following Endoscopic Hemostasis in Bleeding Peptic UlcersEndoscopy, 2001
- Endoclips versus heater probe in preventing early recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer: A prospective and randomized trialGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2001
- Efficacy of Endoscopic Clipping for Bleeding Gastroduodenal Ulcer: Comparison With Topical Ethanol InjectionAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 1999
- Comparison of the hemostatic efficacy of the endoscopic hemoclip method with hypertonic saline–epinephrine injection and a combination of the two for the management of bleeding peptic ulcersGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999
- Bleeding Peptic UlcerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Endoscopic therapy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A meta-analysisGastroenterology, 1992