Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in cclm
- Vol. 44 (6) , 750-9
- https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2006.123
Abstract
Laboratory testing is a highly complex process and, although laboratory services are relatively safe, they are not as safe as they could or should be. Clinical laboratories have long focused their attention on quality control methods and quality assessment programs dealing with analytical aspects of testing. However, a growing body of evidence accumulated in recent decades demonstrates that quality in clinical laboratories cannot be assured by merely focusing on purely analytical aspects. The more recent surveys on errors in laboratory medicine conclude that in the delivery of laboratory testing, mistakes occur more frequently before (pre-analytical) and after (post-analytical) the test has been performed. Most errors are due to pre-analytical factors (46-68.2% of total errors), while a high error rate (18.5-47% of total errors) has also been found in the post-analytical phase. Errors due to analytical problems have been significantly reduced over time, but there is evidence that, particularly for immunoassays, interference may have a serious impact on patients. A description of the most frequent and risky pre-, intra- and post-analytical errors and advice on practical steps for measuring and reducing the risk of errors is therefore given in the present paper. Many mistakes in the Total Testing Process are called "laboratory errors", although these may be due to poor communication, action taken by others involved in the testing process (e.g., physicians, nurses and phlebotomists), or poorly designed processes, all of which are beyond the laboratory's control. Likewise, there is evidence that laboratory information is only partially utilized. A recent document from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) recommends a new, broader definition of the term "laboratory error" and a classification of errors according to different criteria. In a modern approach to total quality, centered on patients' needs and satisfaction, the risk of errors and mistakes in pre- and post-examination steps must be minimized to guarantee the total quality of laboratory services.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The laboratory is a key partner in assuring patient safetyClinics In Laboratory Medicine, 2004
- Information management and informatics: need for a modern pathology serviceAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2004
- Patient-specific Narrative Interpretations of Complex Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Who Is Competent to Provide Them?Clinical Chemistry, 2004
- Classifying Laboratory Incident Reports to Identify Problems That Jeopardize Patient SafetyAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2003
- Review of a pilot quality-assessment program for interpretative commentsAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2002
- Immunometric Assay InterferenceClinical Chemistry, 2002
- Interferences in Immunoassay—Still a ThreatClinical Chemistry, 2000
- Analytical InterferenceAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2000
- Reference Intervals: Are Interlaboratory Differences Appropriate?cclm, 1999
- Postanalytical factors and their influence on analytical quality specificationsScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1999