Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review
- 31 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Cancer Treatment Reviews
- Vol. 35 (8) , 645-652
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.010
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsPublished by Elsevier ,2009
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting BiasPLOS ONE, 2008
- Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort studyBMJ, 2007
- Full publication of results initially presented in abstractsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2007
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic ReviewsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Word limits best explain failings of industry supported meta-analysesBMJ, 2006
- Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic reviewBMJ, 2006
- Erratum to ‘Childhood cancer mortality in Europe, 1955–1995’ Eur J Cancer 2001, 37, 785–809European Journal Of Cancer, 2001
- Childhood cancer mortality in Europe, 1955–1995European Journal Of Cancer, 2001
- Erratum to “Childhood cancer mortality in Europe, 1955–1995” Eur J Cancer 2001, 37, 785–809. F. Levi, C. La Vecchia, E. Negri, F. LucchiniEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2001