Computer-aided diagnosis: A review
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 76 (1) , 82-85
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800760126
Abstract
Fifteen years ago, computer-aided diagnosis of the acute abdomen promised much. Today it is little used. Studies have been flawed by poor trial design, bias, selective reporting of results, statistical naivety and spurious conclusions. The computer system lacks ‘common sense’ and is less accurate than clinicians. Yet its introduction has been associated with improved patient management and outcome. Much of the effect arisess from structured data collection methods and some from audit feedback to clinicians. It is on these innovations, not on the computer, that future work should focus.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study.BMJ, 1986
- Internist-I, an Experimental Computer-Based Diagnostic Consultant for General Internal MedicineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Alternatives to Bayes?Methods of Information in Medicine, 1980
- Computer-assisted diagnosis of acute Crohn's diseaseBritish Journal of Surgery, 1980
- Human and Computer-aided Diagnosis of Abdominal Pain: Further Report with Emphasis on Performance of CliniciansBMJ, 1974
- Is computerized diagnosis possible?Computers and Biomedical Research, 1972
- Clinical Presentation of Acute Abdomen: Study of 600 PatientsBMJ, 1972
- Computer-aided Diagnosis of Acute Abdominal PainBMJ, 1972
- Computer analysis of symptom complexes in patients having upper gastrointestinal examinationsDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1972
- Symptom diagnosis: A comparison of mathematical models related to upper abdominal painComputers and Biomedical Research, 1968