Difference between intraperitoneal and oral gavage application in the micronucleus test
- 1 August 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology
- Vol. 223 (4) , 329-344
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(89)90081-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strain difference in the micronucleus testMutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 1988
- Guidelines for the conduct of micronucleus assays in mammalian bone marrow erythrocytesMutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 1987
- Choice of route of exposure in mammalian genotoxicity experimentsEnvironmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 1987
- Sex difference in the micronucleus testMutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 1986
- Reply to M.D. Shelby's letter to the editorMutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 1986
- A case for the continued use of the intraperitoneal route of exposureMutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 1986
- Cytogenetic effects of quinoxaline-1,4-dioxide-type growth-promoting agents III. Transplacental micronucleus test in miceMutation Research Letters, 1985
- Is there a continuing role for the intraperitoneal injection route of exposure in short-term rodent genotoxicity assays?Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 1985
- Chloracetamide-N-metholol: an example of an in vitro and in vivo clastogen which is non-mutagenic to SalmonellaMutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 1985
- A pilot experiment for the micronucleus testMutation Research Letters, 1984