Myths of Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of Risk
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Social Issues
- Vol. 48 (4) , 21-37
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01943.x
Abstract
Western cultures are engaged in a highly contentious debate involving the identification, assessment, and management of risks to the environment and to public health and safety. Daily claims of new dangers in the food, air, and water we consume, the chemicals, energy, and substances we use, and the products, processes, and artifacts that support us are exacerbating public fears regarding environmental and health hazards. Most research on the perception and communication of risk has focused on possible harms, largely ignoring the cultural contexts in which hazards are framed and debated, and in which risk taking and risk perception occur. This article argues that, while individuals perceive risks and have concerns, it is culture that provides socially constructed myths about nature—systems of belief that are reshaped and internalized by persons, becoming part of their worldview and influencing their interpretation of natural phenomena.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of RiskJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1991
- Accountability and Risk TakingPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991
- Mortality Risks Induced by Economic ExpendituresRisk Analysis, 1990
- Toward a Sustainable WorldScientific American, 1989
- Muddling Through Metaphors to Maturity: A Commentary on Kasperson et al., The Social Amplification of Risk1Risk Analysis, 1988
- The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual FrameworkRisk Analysis, 1988
- Management of Radiation Hazards in Hospitals: Plural Rationalities in a Single InstitutionSocial Studies of Science, 1986
- Risk Analysis and Risk Management: An Historical PerspectiveRisk Analysis, 1985
- Explaining Our Fears: Risk and Culture . An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Mary Douglas and Aaron Wildavsky. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982. x. 222 pp. $14.95.Science, 1983
- Standard setting and risk preference: An elaboration of the theory of achievement motivation and an empirical test.Psychological Review, 1978