Macroscopic thrombus formation on angioplasty equipment following antithrombin therapy with enoxaparin
- 9 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 70 (6) , 847-853
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21253
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that treatment with the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is safe and effective. We evaluated the incidence and consequences of periprocedural macroscopic thrombus formation on PCI equipment following antithrombin therapy with enoxaparin. Between April 2003 and December 2004, all patients undergoing cardiac catheterization following antithrombin therapy with enoxaparin were evaluated. All patients had blood sampled at the onset of procedure for subsequent measurement of anti-factor-Xa levels. Of the 4,504 patients who underwent PCI during this period, in 122 (3%) the procedure was performed within 8 hr of treatment with subcutaneous enoxaparin and no additional unfractionated heparin (UFH) was used periprocedurally. Of these, macroscopic thrombus was observed on PCI equipment in 6 patients (5%) necessitating withdrawal of all catheters and wires. All patients had therapeutic anti-factor-Xa levels at the time of PCI, and had been treated with double antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. No periprocedural thrombus was observed in 356 patients who were ≫12 hr of the last dose of enoxaparin and received UFH at the time of PCI. Following observation of thrombus, additional anticoagulation with UFH resulted in significant epistaxis in one patient. In another patient, the procedure was complicated by distal coronary embolization. Percutaneous coronary intervention following antithrombin therapy with enoxaparin is associated with a 5% incidence of macroscopic thrombus formation on PCI equipment. The necessity for subsequent exchange of all equipment and/or the need for additional anticoagulation may have disastrous consequences for the patient. Our findings suggest that the safety of antithrombin therapy with low molecular weight heparin during PCI requires further evaluation.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Enoxaparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in Elective Percutaneous Coronary InterventionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Comparison of Enoxaparin Versus Heparin During Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Performed With Either Eptifibatide or Tirofiban (The ACTION Trial)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Effect of multielement intravascular ultrasound on the anticoagulant potency of enoxaparinThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- Reliable anticoagulation with enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin in PCI (PEPCI) studyCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2004
- Low‐molecular‐weight heparin during percutaneous coronary interventions: Rationale, results, and recommendationsCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2003
- Safety of concomitant therapy with eptifibatide and enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Results of the coronary revascularization using integrilin and single bolus enoxaparin studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003
- Low–molecular-weight heparin therapy for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and during percutaneous coronary intervention: An expert consensus*American Heart Journal, 2002
- Pharmacokinetics of intravenous/subcutaneous Enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary interventionsCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2002
- Enoxaparin Prevents Death and Cardiac Ischemic Events in Unstable Angina/Non–Q-Wave Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 1999
- A Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin with Unfractionated Heparin for Unstable Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997