Abstract
Three studies examined the relationship between age and creativity in terms of when the masterpieces of major historical artists were produced and when their total creative efforts declined. In Study 1, the lifelong output of 21 long‐lived painters (age = 79+) was tallied; in Study 2, the productivity of a new set of 24 long‐lived male and female artists was compared; and in Study 3, the ages at which masterpieces were produced by several sets of up to 100 relatively short‐ and long‐lived artists were examined. Masterpieces were done in the artists’ 40s and 50s, which is later than the often‐cited 30s. Productivity did not decline until the 50s or 60s, which is later than the 40s reported for musicians and writers. The results were discussed in terms of gender differences, group and individual analyses, interdisciplinary research relating psychology to the humanities, the importance of including old and very old subjects in studies of creative development, and an optimistic view of aging and cognition. The findings suggest that creativity in other kinds of artists, and nonartists in general, may be maximized later and longer than previously believed.