Targeted Intranasal Mupirocin To Prevent Colonization and Infection by Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains in Soldiers: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
- 1 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 51 (10) , 3591-3598
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01086-06
Abstract
Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is an emerging pathogen that primarily manifests as uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections. We conducted a cluster randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether targeted intranasal mupirocin therapy in CA-MRSA-colonized soldiers could prevent infection in the treated individual and prevent new colonization and infection within their study groups. We screened 3,447 soldiers comprising 14 training classes for CA-MRSA colonization from January to December 2005. Each training class was randomized to either the mupirocin or placebo study group, and the participants identified as CA-MRSA colonized were treated with either mupirocin or placebo. All participants underwent repeat screening after 8 to 10 weeks and were monitored for 16 weeks for development of infection. Of 3,447 participants screened, 134 (3.9%) were initially colonized with CA-MRSA. Five of 65 (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.0% to 11.4%) placebo-treated participants and 7 of 66 (10.6%; 95% CI, 7.9% to 13.3%) mupirocin-treated participants developed infections; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo- and mupirocin-treated groups was −2.9% (95% CI, −7.5% to 1.7%). Of those not initially colonized with CA-MRSA, 63 of 1,459 (4.3%; 95% CI, 2.7% to 5.9%) of the placebo group and 56 of 1,607 (3.5%; 95% CI, 2.6% to 5.2%) of the mupirocin group developed infections; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo and mupirocin groups was 0.8% (95% CI, −1.0% to 2.7%). Of 3,447 participants, 3,066 (89%) were available for the second sampling and completed follow-up. New CA-MRSA colonization occurred in 24 of 1,459 (1.6%; 95% CI, 0.05% to 2.8%) of the placebo group participants and 23 of 1,607 (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.05% to 2.3%) of the mupirocin group participants; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo and mupirocin groups was 0.2% (95% CI, −1.3% to 1.7%). Despite CA-MRSA eradication in colonized participants, this study showed no decrease in infections in either the mupirocin-treated individuals or within their study group. Furthermore, CA-MRSA eradication did not prevent new colonization within the study group.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methicillin-ResistantS. aureusInfections among Patients in the Emergency DepartmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Prevalence ofStaphylococcus aureusNasal Colonization in the United States, 2001–2002The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Community‐Associated Methicillin‐ResistantStaphylococcus aureus:The Way to the Wound Is through the NoseThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Community‐Associated Methicillin‐ResistantStaphylococcus aureusClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusDisease in Three CommunitiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Necrotizing Fasciitis Caused by Community-Associated Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusin Los AngelesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Severe Staphylococcal Sepsis in Adolescents in the Era of Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPediatrics, 2005
- A Clone of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusamong Professional Football PlayersNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Nasal Carriage as a Source ofStaphylococcus aureusBacteremiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Staphylococcus aureusNasal Carriage and Infection in Patients on HemodialysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986