The Fowlkes–Mallows Statistic and the Comparison of Two Independently Determined Dendrograms
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Vol. 45 (6) , 971-975
- https://doi.org/10.1139/f88-119
Abstract
When interpreting the results of a cluster analysis, it is important to understand why specific clustering patterns arise. Comparison of a "dependent" dendrogram with a second, independently determined "covariate" dendrogram (i.e. one that is based solely on information provided by various explanatory variables) is a simple way of investigating the role played by the covariates. The Fowlkes–Mallows statistic, which is a measure of the degree of similarity between two dendrograms, can be used to test the null hypothesis that two dendrograms are unrelated. We show that the Fowlkes–Mallows test can be usefully employed in the systematic comparison of a dependent dendrogram and covariate dendrogram. Since the test is nonparametric, it is applicable to a wide range of problems. As an illustrative example, a species abundance matrix for several benthic communities is subjected to a standard cluster analysis, and the resultant (dependent) dendrogram is compared with a clustering based on the geographic location of the communities. At least some of the clustering seen in the dependent dendrogram can be attributed to the geographic proximity of the stations.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using the Bootstrap to Assess Statistical Significance in the Cluster Analysis of Species Abundance DataCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1988
- A Method for Comparing Two Hierarchical ClusteringsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983
- An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern WisconsinEcological Monographs, 1957