Ideology and party support in comparative perspective
- 1 February 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Political Research
- Vol. 25 (2) , 111-149
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1994.tb00414.x
Abstract
From the original Downs (1957) conceptualization to the Enelow and Hinich (1984) reformulation, ideology has been the key organizing dimension for electoral competition in the spatial model. The unidimensional spatial model is best suited to responsible multiparty systems where left‐right position is known to be an important determinant of individual political behaviour. We contrast the traditional spatial model with the directional model recently proposed by Rabinowitz and Macdonald (1989) and test the models using data from six northern European democracies. Based on 57 different parties, the results suggest that even in this unidimensional ideological context the cleavage‐oriented directional model provides a better explanation of mass attachments to political parties.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Issues and Party Support in Multiparty SystemsAmerican Political Science Review, 1991
- New Players in an Old GameComparative Political Studies, 1991
- 7 The Left-Right SchemaPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1990
- Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial SocietyPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1990
- Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral SystemsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1990
- A Directional Theory of Issue VotingAmerican Political Science Review, 1989
- Left–Right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ JudgmentsEuropean Journal of Political Research, 1984
- The Parties Come to Order! Dimensions of Preferential Choice in the West German Electorate, 1961–1976American Political Science Review, 1979
- An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral ProcessAmerican Political Science Review, 1970
- Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical MethodPsychometrika, 1964