COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY AND LAPAROSCOPY IN INFERTILE PATIENTS
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 60 (2) , 149-151
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.1981.tb00027.x
Abstract
The diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy was investigated in 168 consecutive patients with infertility of at least 2 years' duration. There was agreement between the results of both methods in 57.7 per cent of the patients. Among 54 patients having normal HSG, 16 (29.6 per cent) exhibited abnormalities at laparoscopy. Among 114 patients with abnormal HSG, 28 (24.6 per cent) had entirely normal internal genitalia at laparos‐copy. The greatest discrepancy between the HSG and laparoscopic diagnoses was found in peritubal adhesions. Intrauterine abnormalities were diagnosed by HSG in only 2.4 per cent of the patients. Complications of laparoscopy were few and non was serious. For a conclusive evaluation of the tubal factor in infertility, one must consider abandoning HSG entirely in favor of laparoscopy.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Hysterosalpingography and Endoscopy in Evaluation of Tubal Function in Infertile WomenFertility and Sterility, 1976
- Correlation between Hysterosalpingography and Pelvic Endoscopy for the Evaluation of Tubal FactorFertility and Sterility, 1975
- INDICATIONS, CONTRAINDICATIONS AND COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPYObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1975
- A Comparison of the Results of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy in the Diagnosis of Fallopian Tube DysfunctionFertility and Sterility, 1972
- Vergleichende Untersuchungen zwischen dem Wert der Hysterosalpingographie und der Coelioskopie bei der SterilitätsdiagnostikArchiv für Gynäkologie, 1967