Abstract
This is an analysis of a survey of executive boards in five amateur sport organizations in Ontario, Canada, concerning a possible sexual double standard in requirements for mobility to leadership positions. Variables examined include prior experiences in sport and other voluntary organizations, orientations toward the sport volunteer role, and family and social status. Results provide little evidence of a sexual double standard. However, social status is higher in the case of men. Organizational structure and history greatly influence patterns of recruitment and mobility to leadership positions. Possibly the underrepresentation of, and sexual discrimination against women increase with the level of the position.

This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit: