Double-Blind Evaluation of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Oral Once-Daily 750-Milligram and 1-Gram Doses of Levofloxacin in Healthy Volunteers
- 1 April 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 42 (4) , 885-888
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.42.4.885
Abstract
The safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily oral levofloxacin in 16 healthy male volunteers were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Subjects were randomly assigned to the treatment ( n = 10) or placebo group ( n = 6). In study period 1, 750 mg of levofloxacin or a placebo was administered orally as a single dose on day 1, followed by a washout period on days 2 and 3; dosing resumed for days 4 to 10. Following a 3-day washout period, 1 g of levofloxacin or a placebo was administered in a similar fashion in period 2. Plasma and urine levofloxacin concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by model-independent methods. Levofloxacin was rapidly absorbed after single and multiple once-daily 750-mg and 1-g doses with an apparently large volume of distribution. Peak plasma levofloxacin concentration ( C max ) values were generally attained within 2 h postdose. The mean values of C max and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC 0–24 ) following a single 750-mg dose were 7.1 μg/ml and 71.3 μg · h/ml, respectively, compared to 8.6 μg/ml and 90.7 μg · h/ml, respectively, at steady state. Following the single 1-g dose, mean C max and AUC 0–24 values were 8.9 μg/ml and 95.4 μg · h/ml, respectively; corresponding values at steady state were 11.8 μg/ml and 118 μg · h/ml. These C max and AUC 0–24 values indicate modest and similar degrees of accumulation upon multiple dosing at the two dose levels. Values of apparent total body clearance (CL/ F ), apparent volume of distribution ( V ss / F ), half-life ( t 1/2 ), and renal clearance (CL R ) were similar for the two dose levels and did not vary from single to multiple dosing. Mean steady-state values for CL/ F , V ss / F , t 1/2 , and CL R following 750 mg of levofloxacin were 143 ml/min, 100 liters, 8.8 h, and 116 ml/min, respectively; corresponding values for the 1-g dose were 146 ml/min, 105 liters, 8.9 h, and 105 ml/min. In general, the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in healthy subjects following 750-mg and 1-g single and multiple once-daily oral doses appear to be consistent with those found in previous studies of healthy volunteers given 500-mg doses. Levofloxacin was well tolerated at either high dose level. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were nausea and headache.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid stereospecific high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of levofloxacin in human plasma and urineJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 1997
- Comparative in vitro activity of levofloxacin and ofloxacin against Gram-positive bacteriaDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1996
- SESSION III SAFETYInfectious Diseases in Clinical Practice, 1994
- Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patientsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1993
- In vitro activities of azithromycin, clarithromycin, L-ofloxacin, and other antibiotics against Chlamydia pneumoniaeAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1992
- The postantibiotic suppressive effect of l-ofloxacin, an optically active isomer of ofloxacinDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1992
- In vitro Antibacterial Activity of DR-3355, the S-(––)-Isomer of OfloxacinChemotherapy, 1990
- Noncompartmental Determination of the Steady-State Volume of Distribution During Multiple DosingJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1984
- Ordered Hypotheses for Multiple Treatments: A Significance Test for Linear RanksJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1963
- Ordered Hypotheses for Multiple Treatments: A Significance Test for Linear RanksJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1963