Dinsmoor's selective observing hypothesis probably cannot account for a preference for unpredictable rewards: DMOD can
- 1 June 1986
- journal article
- continuing commentary
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 9 (2) , 365-367
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00023074
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- DMOD—A mathematical model of reward and aversive nonreward in appetitive learning situations: Program and instruction manualBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1984
- Observing and conditioned reinforcementBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1983
- Ways of observing conditioned reinforcementBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1983
- Observing responses and the limits of animal learning theoryBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1983
- Escape-from-fear performance as affected by handling method and an additional CS-shock treatmentLearning & Behavior, 1980
- A history of rat preference for signalled shock: From paradox to paradigmAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1979
- Reliability and sources of control of preference for signaled shockLearning & Behavior, 1977
- An integrative progress report on informational control in humans: Some laboratory findings and methodological claimsAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1975
- Wyckoff's observing response: Pigeons learn to observe stimuli for free food but not stimuli for extinctionLearning and Motivation, 1974
- A time variable in the acquisition of observing responses.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1960