External Quality Assessment for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis
Open Access
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 43 (3) , 1341-1347
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.43.3.1341-1347.2005
Abstract
The use of molecular methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis is increasing in clinical laboratories. External quality assessment enables unbiased monitoring of the performance of laboratories in the detection of specific pathogens. This study details the results of molecular and enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) testing for C. trachomatis detection in simulated endocervical swab specimens recently distributed internationally by United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Microbiology (UK NEQAS for Microbiology) external quality assessment panels. The frequency of accurate detection of C. trachomatis in the panels ranged from 32 to 100%. Participants using molecular methods were significantly more likely to detect C. trachomatis in specimens than those using an EIA. Two strains were distributed with the panels: an L2 laboratory-adapted strain and an uncharacterized primary isolate. Further analysis indicated a difference in detection of C. trachomatis between specific methods only with the L2 strain at lower concentrations. In addition, eight negative specimens were distributed, and false positives were found to be rare by all methods included in the study.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Urine SpecimensJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Comparison of the APTIMA CT and GC Assays with the APTIMA Combo 2 Assay, the Abbott LCx Assay, and Direct Fluorescent-Antibody and Culture Assays for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeaeJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Reliability of Nucleic Acid Amplification Methods for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Urine: Results of the First International Collaborative Quality Control Study among 96 LaboratoriesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Specimen Processing and Concentration of Chlamydia trachomatis Added Can Influence False-Negative Rates in the LCx Assay but Not in the APTIMA Combo 2 Assay When Testing for InhibitorsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- External Quality Assessment Program for Chlamydia trachomatis Diagnostic Testing by Nucleic Acid Amplification AssaysJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Accuracy of Results Obtained by Performing a Second Ligase Chain Reaction Assay and PCR Analysis on Urine Samples with Positive or Near-Cutoff Results in the LCx Test for Chlamydia trachomatisJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Urinary inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction and testing of multiple specimens may contribute to lower assay sensitivities for diagnosingChlamydia trachomatisinfected womenMolecular and Cellular Probes, 1997
- Three New Serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis: Da, la, and L2aThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Association of Recurrent Chlamydial Infection with GonorrheaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1989
- Comparison of Chlamydia trachomatis Serovars Causing Rectal and Cervical InfectionsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1987