Equity and the new post‐compulsory education and training policies in Australia: a progressive or regressive agenda?
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Education Policy
- Vol. 9 (2) , 105-127
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093940090201
Abstract
This paper explores the background and context of the Australian federal government's new post‐compulsory education and training policies. It examines the social, economic and political context within which the policies have been developed, and the way in which competing interests have been ‘stitched’ together in the new consensual policy‐making process. It is argued that the resulting policy directions (expressed in the Finn, Mayer and Carmichael reports), where goals of micro‐economic reform are linked to equity issues, represent an ambiguous policy mix and offer contradictory possibilities for young people. The implications of these ambiguities for reform strategies will be discussed, together with considerations relating to the politics of educational change.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- “EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES” POLICIES AND THE 1988 EDUCATION REFORM ACT IN BRITAIN: Equity issues in cultural and political contextDiscourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1993
- The gendering of skill and vocationalism in twentieth‐century Australian educationJournal of Education Policy, 1992
- Restructuring the welfare state - the case of the abolition of the Inner London Education AuthorityCritical Social Policy, 1991
- Higher education policy in Australia: corporate or coercive federalism?Journal of Education Policy, 1991
- Policy‐making for Australian schooling: the new corporate federalismJournal of Education Policy, 1991
- Labor's Economic Policies in Higher EducationThe Australian Quarterly, 1990
- Social Democracy and Social JusticeJournal of Sociology, 1989
- Understanding schoolingPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1988
- Two-Track TrainingPublished by Springer Nature ,1987