Caveat emptor: The treachery of work-up bias
- 30 September 2004
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 128 (3) , 341-344
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.03.039
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fluorine 18–tagged fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic scanning to predict lymph node metastasis, invasiveness, or both, in clinical T1 N0 M0 lung adenocarcinomaThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2004
- Accounting for Nonignorable Verification Bias in Assessment of Diagnostic TestsBiometrics, 2003
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD InitiativeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Effects of adjustment for referral bias on the sensitivity and specificity of single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The identification of bias in studies of the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities.The British Journal of Radiology, 1997
- The importance of work-up (verification) bias correction in assessing the accuracy of SPECT thallium-201 testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery diseaseJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- “Work-up bias”Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Reverend Bayes' silent majorityThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- The effect of validation group bias on screening tests for coronary artery diseaseStatistics in Medicine, 1985
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978