Reliability of self-reported weight and height among State bank employees
Open Access
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Revista de Saúde Pública
- Vol. 33 (1) , 16-23
- https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89101999000100004
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Self-reported weight and height were compared with direct measurements in order to evaluate the agreement between the two sources. METHOD: Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study on health status from a probabilistic sample of 1,183 employees of a bank, in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Direct measurements were made of 322 employees. Differences between the two sources were evaluated using mean differences, limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Men and women tended to underestimate their weight while differences between self-reported and measured height were insignificant. Body mass index (BMI) mean differences were smaller than those observed for weight. ICC was over 0.98 for weight and 0.95 for BMI, expressing close agreement. Combining a graphical method with ICC may be useful in pilot studies to detect populational groups capable of providing reliable information on weight and height, thus minimizing resources needed for field work.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- High temporal, geographic, and income variation in body mass index among adults in Brazil.American Journal of Public Health, 1994
- Validity of self-reported weight: a study of urban brazilian adultsRevista de Saúde Pública, 1993
- Validity of cardiovascular disease risk factors assessed by telephone survey: The behavioral risk factor surveyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Índice de massa corporal (massa corporal.estatura-2) como indicador do estado nutricional de adultos: revisão da literaturaRevista de Saúde Pública, 1992
- UNDERESTIMATION OF RELATIVE WEIGHT BY USE OF SELF-REPORTED HEIGHT AND WEIGHTAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- COMPARISON OF SELF-REPORTED AND MEASURED HEIGHT AND WEIGHTAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1982
- Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordanceClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1981
- Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- ON THE METHODS AND THEORY OF RELIABILITYJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1976