Safety and Diagnostic Yield of Noninvasive Ventricular Stimulation Performed Via Tiered Therapy Implantable Defibrillators
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 17 (12) , 2263-2273
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb02374.x
Abstract
Extensive electrophysiological testing is critical for the effective utilization of sophisticated tachycardia detection and termination algorithms available in tiered therapy ICDs. To evaluate the safety and diagnostic yield of electrophysiological testing via noninvasive ventricular stimulation, we performed 294 electrophysiological studies in 154 patients (age 65 +/- 10; left ventricular ejection fraction 0.36 +/- 0.15) with tiered therapy ICDs. Stimulation was performed under methohexital anesthesia. A total of 918 sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias were induced (3.1 +/- 2.5 per procedure): monomorphic VT, 550; ventricular flutter, 74; and VF, 246. The results of invasive and noninvasive programmed stimulation were compared for 79 patients who had both studies under similar treatment. Overall concordance was 83%, and did not differ significantly between patients who had the noninvasive stimulation via epicardial or endocardial pacing leads. VF could be induced in 206 of 257 studies (82%), and it was less likely to be induced in patients on amiodarone (74% vs 85%; P = 0.02), or beta blockers (55% vs 83%; P = 0.017). No patient presented a serious complication. Minor complications occurred during 39 studies: transient laryngospasm in 1, unintended delivery of an ICD shock to a conscious patient in 4; induction of sustained atrial fibrillation in 8; need for external rescue defibrillation shocks in 13; and delivery of inappropriate shocks for supraventricular rhythms in 14 studies. Noninvasive ventricular stimulation performed under methohexital anesthesia is safe. Its diagnostic yield compares favorably with that of conventional electrophysiological studies. VF can be induced in a majority of patients. There is good correlation between invasive and noninvasive programmed stimulation for induction of VT. Noninvasive ventricular stimulation may emerge as standard procedure for the initial programming and follow-up of ICDs.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Ventricular Arrhythmias Induced with Programmed Stimulation Versus Alternating CurrentPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1993
- Clinical experience with a tiered-therapy, multiprogrammable antiarrhythmia device.Circulation, 1992
- Long-term multicenter experience with a second-generation implantable pacemaker-defibrillator in patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmiasJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Cardiovascular Practice: Report of the Policy Conference of the North American Society of Pacing and ElectrophysiologyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
- Prospective comparison of a conventional and an accelerated protocol for programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with coronary artery disease.Circulation, 1991
- Safety of External Cardioversion/Defibrillation in Patients with Internal Defibrillation Patches and No DevicePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
- Noninvasive electrophysiologic study using standard permanent pacemakers in patients with spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- The implantable transvenous cardioverter: long-term efficacy and reproducible induction of ventricular tachycardia.Circulation, 1986
- Clinical transvenous cardioversion of recurrent life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias: Low energy synchronized cardioversion of ventricular tachycardia and termination of ventricular fibrillation in patients using a catheter electrodeAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- PROGRAMMED STIMULATION FOR LONG-TERM TREATMENT AND NON-INVASIVE INVESTIGATION OF RECURRENT TACHYCARDIAThe Lancet, 1981