Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 367 (9505) , 122-132
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)67961-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic AccuracyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative surveyGynecologic Oncology, 2003
- Liquid‐based cytology: is this the way forward for cervical screening?Cytopathology, 2002
- Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: A metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2001
- Accuracy of the Papanicolaou Test in Screening for and Follow-up of Cervical Cytologic AbnormalitiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2000
- Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Tests With Imperfect Reference StandardsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- ThinPrep Pap Test?Cancer, 1999
- Use of the Thin Prep® Pap Test™ in clinical practiceDiagnostic Cytopathology, 1999
- Conventional Cervical Cytologic Smears vs. ThinPrep SmearsActa Cytologica, 1996
- Meta-analysis of Pap Test AccuracyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1995