Reducing Spurious Response in a Field Survey
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 129 (2) , 201-212
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9711721
Abstract
Spurious response occurs when survey respondents claim to recognize or remember advertisements, names, institutions, or other stimuli that do not exist. Researchers fear that these same respondents may give invalid responses to genuine survey items as well, thereby distorting the findings and conclusions of survey research. In a field experiment to reduce spurious recall of bogus brand names without also reducing recall of genuine brand names, 300 grocery shoppers in a southern city were provided with a warning or disclaimer that some questionnaire items were fictitious along with a “don't-know” response option. The results showed that only the don't-know option reduced spurious response, and this by very little. Genuine brand response, however, was unaffected. The data also suggested that spurious response could bias the findings of a survey.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spurious response error in a new product surveyJournal of Business Research, 1988
- Personality and Uninformed Response ErrorThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1986
- Uninformed response rates in survey research: New evidenceJournal of Business Research, 1985
- Uninformed Response Error in Survey ResearchJournal of Marketing Research, 1981
- Public Opinion and Public Ignorance: The Fine Line Between Attitudes and NonattitudesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1980
- On the use of distractors for testing recognition memory.Psychological Bulletin, 1980
- The Influence of Instructions on Respondent ErrorJournal of Marketing Research, 1970
- Detecting respondents who fake and confuse information about question areas on surveys.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1966
- Hidden Errors in Survey DataJournal of Marketing, 1962
- Hidden Errors in Survey DataJournal of Marketing, 1962