Distributional Struggle and Moral Order in a Market Society
- 1 February 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociology
- Vol. 21 (1) , 55-73
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038587021001005
Abstract
This paper challenges the widely held view that novel and fundamental changes in the structure of social hierarchy have altered the basis of distributional conflict in modern Britain. Reference to nineteenth-century developments shows that sectionalism, egoism and privatism are not peculiar to the present economic recession. It is then argued that commentators on the left and right alike have oversimplified the relationship between the distributional order of societies, on the one hand, and the specific forms taken by distributional conflicts on the other. This means that the implications of the lack of a capitalist Sittlichkeit (morality or moral order) for social integration may be quite different from those commonly drawn in recent studies.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Class Struggle and the Industrial RevolutionPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- Class, Citizenship, and Distributional Conflict in Modern BritainBritish Journal of Sociology, 1985
- Public expenditure cuts in Britain and consumption sectoral cleavages1International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1984
- Bravermania and Beyond: Recent Theories of the Labour ProcessSociology, 1982
- ‘The labour aristocracy’ and ‘incorporation’: Notes on some terms in the social history of the working classSocial History, 1981
- Urban Political AnalysisPublished by Springer Nature ,1980
- History, sociology and the quiescence of the British working class: A reply to ReidSocial History, 1979
- The Marxist theory of the labour aristocracySocial History, 1978
- For T. H. MarshallSociology, 1974
- The Social Cohesion of Liberal DemocracyAmerican Sociological Review, 1970