Patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial
- 30 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 7 (1) , 6-17
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00232.x
Abstract
To show breast cancer patient involvement in the design of a national randomized trial of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in symptomatic patients will increase accrual. Three stakeholder groups [(1) researchers from the Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, (2) the Consumers' Advisory Group for Clinical Trials (CAG-CT), (3) clinicians responsible for a pilot randomized HRT study in breast cancer patients] developed this collaborative study. (1) Nine focus group discussions were conducted to identify issues relevant to breast cancer patients about HRT and a national trial: six involved women from breast cancer support groups nationwide and three patients who had previously participated in the pilot randomized HRT study. (2) Recommendations from the focus groups (analysed by Grounded Theory) were debated by the research stakeholders and focus group representatives at a 1-day meeting and consensus reached (using a voting system) on mutual priorities for incorporation into the design of a national HRT trial. (3) Representatives from the CAG-CT and focus groups participated in subsequent national HRT steering committee meetings to ensure that these priorities were accounted for and the resulting trial design summary was circulated to the CAG-CT and all focus group representatives for comment. Focus groups demonstrated that the complexity of factors relating to trial participation was not just restricted to the research topic in question. Patient-clinician interaction provided a platform for negotiating potential conflicts over trial design and outcomes. Patient feedback suggested that mutually agreed priorities were accounted for in the trial design. Clinical research planning should involve all research stakeholders at the outset. Quantifying the impact of patient involvement in terms of trial accrual may be too simple given the complexity of their motivations for participating in trials.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Consumers and trials.The Lancet, 2001
- Hormone Replacement Therapy After Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Assessment of RiskJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centresBritish Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Are randomized trials of hormone replacement therapy in symptomatic women with breast cancer feasible?Fertility and Sterility, 2000
- Contribution of randomised controlled trials to understanding and management of early breast cancerBMJ, 1999
- Developing clinical trial protocols: The use of patient focus groupsPsycho‐Oncology, 1995
- The prevalence of menopausal symptoms in patients treated for breast cancerClinical Oncology, 1994
- Can a Clinical Trial be the Treatment of Choice for Patients With Cancer?1JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1988