Deciphering the Palimpsest: Studying the Relationship Between Morphological Integration and Phenotypic Covariation
Top Cited Papers
- 20 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Evolutionary Biology
- Vol. 36 (4) , 355-376
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-009-9076-5
Abstract
Organisms represent a complex arrangement of anatomical structures and individuated parts that must maintain functional associations through development. This integration of variation between functionally related body parts and the modular organization of development are fundamental determinants of their evolvability. This is because integration results in the expression of coordinated variation that can create preferred directions for evolutionary change, while modularity enables variation in a group of traits or regions to accumulate without deleterious effects on other aspects of the organism. Using our own work on both model systems (e.g., lab mice, avians) and natural populations of rodents and primates, we explore in this paper the relationship between patterns of phenotypic covariation and the developmental determinants of integration that those patterns are assumed to reflect. We show that integration cannot be reliably studied through phenotypic covariance patterns alone and argue that the relationship between phenotypic covariation and integration is obscured in two ways. One is the superimposition of multiple determinants of covariance in complex systems and the other is the dependence of covariation structure on variances in covariance-generating processes. As a consequence, we argue that the direct study of the developmental determinants of integration in model systems is necessary to fully interpret patterns of covariation in natural populations, to link covariation patterns to the processes that generate them, and to understand their significance for evolutionary explanation.Keywords
This publication has 100 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unique organization of the frontonasal ectodermal zone in birds and mammalsDevelopmental Biology, 2009
- Heritability of human cranial dimensions: comparing the evolvability of different cranial regionsJournal of Anatomy, 2008
- Short‐faced mice and developmental interactions between the brain and the faceJournal of Anatomy, 2008
- Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate charactersJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 2008
- Spatial packing, cranial base angulation, and craniofacial shape variation in the mammalian skull: testing a new model using miceJournal of Anatomy, 2008
- Phenotypic variability and craniofacial dysmorphology: increased shape variance in a mouse model for cleft lipJournal of Anatomy, 2008
- The road to modularityNature Reviews Genetics, 2007
- Indian Hedgehog produced by postnatal chondrocytes is essential for maintaining a growth plate and trabecular boneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Craniofacial levels and the morphological maturation of the human skullJournal of Anatomy, 2006
- Development of bat flight: Morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digitsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006