Mobil's epideictic advocacy: “Observations” of Prometheus‐bound
- 1 December 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 50 (4) , 380-394
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758309390176
Abstract
Among “corporate rhetors,” none has been regarded as more creative and aggressive than Mobil Oil. This essay examines Mobil's use of “Observations"—half‐page Sunday newspaper magazine section ads—during the years of 1976–1980. The first focus is upon “Observations” as epideictic discourse developed in response to Mobil's 1975 rhetorical situation. Attention is then turned to examples of the discourse itself and a summary of 149 “Observations.” Following the analysis are treatments of the identificational strategies used by Mobil and the Promethean myth which gives those strategies universal appeal. Finally, Mobil's “epideictic advocacy” is evaluated by the standards of effect, ethics, and art. Through “Observations” Mobil intends to be—like the Sunday newspaper—a part of America's afternoon.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ike: Identification, argument, and paradoxical appealQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1977
- Industry, mass magazines, and the ecology issueQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1973
- Rhetoric of MotivesPublished by University of California Press ,1969
- Kenneth Burke's dramatistic approach in speech criticismQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1955
- Kenneth burke and the “new rhetoric”Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1952