Is the ‘simple carry‐over’ model useful?
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 11 (6) , 715-726
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780110603
Abstract
It is argued that the models usually employed for carry‐over effects in cross‐over trials are not reasonable. The example of a non‐linear dose response for a dose‐finding trial arranged in a Williams square is developed to show that if carry‐over is present to any appreciable degree the usual statistical models provide no guaranteed protection against its effects. It is concluded that the most reasonably defended assumption about carry‐over effects is that no important carry‐over has taken place and that, where this assumption cannot be defended, statistical models provide no satisfactory substitute for it.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A simulation study comparing designs for dose rangingStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Factorial designs for crossover clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- Repeated measurements: What is measured and what repeats?Statistics in Medicine, 1990
- The performance of the two‐stage analysis of two‐treatment, two‐period crossover trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- A critique of recent research on the two-treatment crossover designControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Design and Analysis of Cross-Over TrialsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1989
- The Desirability of Adjusting for Residual Effects in a Crossover DesignPublished by JSTOR ,1984
- PharmacokineticsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1982
- 328. Note: The Use of None-Parametric Methods in the Statistical Analysis of the Two-Period Change-Over DesignPublished by JSTOR ,1972
- Cross-over designs in bioassayProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1956