Quantitation of absolute area of a coronary arterial stenosis: experimental validation with a preparation in vivo.
- 1 November 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 74 (5) , 1099-1106
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.74.5.1099
Abstract
The absolute cross-sectional area of a coronary stenosis measured by quantitative coronary angiography correlates well with its hemodynamic significance. We evaluated a combined approach using edge detection applied to the normal segment and videodensitometry applied to the stenosis to determine the absolute cross-sectional area of the stenosis (videodensity method). The results were then compared with those with the edge detection method applied directly to the stenosis. The area of the stenosis by the edge detection method was calculated by analyzing two orthogonal projections for irregular stenoses and with use of the formula for the area of an ellipse (ellipse method). The accuracy of both these techniques was assessed by analyzing digital angiograms acquired from closed-chest dogs in which 10 plastic cylinders with precisely machined circular and irregular lumina were inserted into the coronary arteries. Angiograms of irregular stenoses were acquired in two orthogonal views. The ellipse method applied to circular stenoses was very accurate, with r = .97, average absolute difference (AAD) = 0.21 mm2, and SEE = 0.30. For the videodensity method r = .97, AAD = 0.84 mm2, and SEE = 0.40. Irregular stenoses were better quantitated by the videodensity method applied in one view (AAD = 0.50 mm2, SEE = 0.47) than by the ellipse method applied in two orthogonal projections (AAD = 1.03 mm2, SEE = 0.87). Overall, the two methods were comparable in accuracy (for videodensity, AAD = 0.65 mm2, SEE = 0.71 vs AAD = 0.54 mm2, SEE = 0.79 for ellipse).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VII. Validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated functional measure of stenosis severity reflecting all its geometric dimensionsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1986
- Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: Diameter versus densitometric area measurementsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- The value of lesion cross-sectional area determined by quantitative coronary angiography in assessing the physiologic significance of proximal left anterior descending coronary arterial stenoses.Circulation, 1984
- Does Visual Interpretation of the Coronary Arteriogram Predict the Physiologic Importance of a Coronary Stenosis?New England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Application of digital techniques to selective coronary arteriography: Use of myocardial contrast appearance time to measure coronary flow reserveAmerican Heart Journal, 1984
- Comparison of three methods of evaluating coronary obstructive lesions: Postmortem arteriography, pathologic examination and measurement of regional myocardial perfusion during maximal vasodilationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- Production of a critical coronary arterial stenosis in closed chest laboratory animals: Description of a new nonsurgical method based on standard cardiac catheterization techniquesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1981
- Veterans administration cooperative study of surgery for coronary arterial occlusive disease: III. Methods and baseline characteristics, including experience with medical treatmentThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977
- Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistancePublished by Elsevier ,1974
- Pathology of coronary atherosclerosisProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1971