Comparison of the Valtrac biofragmentable anastomosis ring with conventional suture and stapled anastomosis in colon surgery
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 32 (3) , 183-187
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02554523
Abstract
In a randomized, prospective study of 438 patients, the safety and efficacy of the Valtrac biofragmentable anastomotic ring (BAR) was compared with stapling and with conventional suture techniques. There was no significant difference in the morbidity, mortality, and clinical course of the patients. The BAR can effect reestablishment of intestinal continuity somewhat more rapidly, but its major advantage is its uniform applicability to all areas of the intestinal tract, except the low rectum.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Initial clinical experience with a biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1987
- Comparison of stapling and handsuture for left-sided large bowel anastomosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1985
- Anastomosis to the rectumDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1985
- Large bowel anastomoses. II. The circular staplersBritish Journal of Surgery, 1983
- The low stapled anastomosisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1981
- Colorectal anastomoses with the EEA staplerWorld Journal of Surgery, 1981
- Complications of anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling deviceBritish Journal of Surgery, 1981
- Elective resection for diverticular disease and carcinomaDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1981
- Anterior resection for adenocarcinoma: Lahey clinic experience from 1963 through 1969The American Journal of Surgery, 1976