A double‐blind comparison of flupenthixol, nortriptyline and diazepam in neurotic depression
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Vol. 59 (1) , 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1979.tb06940.x
Abstract
A double-blind trial of flupenthixol, nortriptyline and diazepam in neurotic depression using flexible dose schedules with human patients suggested that each drug was an efficient treatment although the patterns of response and prevalence of side-effects varied. No significant differences were shown on rating scales of depression or anxiety, but trends favored flupenthixol. Clinical evaluation suggested flupenthixol was more effective than diazepam on mental state examination and had a greater overall therapeutic effect than nortriptyline. It had fewer side-effects than nortriptyline.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Withdrawal symptoms in neonates from intrauterine exposure to diazepamThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1977
- The Sensitivity of the Beck Depression Inventory to Changes of SymptomatologyThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1974
- Treatment of depression in general practice: a controlled trial of flupenthixol (‘Fluanxol’)Current Medical Research and Opinion, 1974
- Treatment of Depression in General PracticeBMJ, 1973
- SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF WITH FLUPENTIXOL (FLUANXOL) OF THE ANXIOUS‐ALGETIC‐DEPRESSIVE SYNDROME COMPLEX IN NEUROTIC STATES| AActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1973
- Flupenthixol (Fluanxol)The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1971
- Behandling af depressive tilstande med FlupentixolNordisk Psykiatrisk Tidsskrift, 1966
- Do psyhiatric out-patients take their drugs?BMJ, 1965
- A FOLLOW‐UP OF SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENTS IN EDINBURGHActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1963
- The General Practitioner and the Schizophrenic PatientBMJ, 1962